Tuesday, July 31, 2012

A few tweaks for the Games (Part 2)


(Part 1, Part 3)

Rule Number 2: It must be a sport.

This may come across as a little harsh, but certain events in the Olympics really look like they were ‘created’ just to have an Olympic event, and as such, don’t really raise the quality of the Olympic brand. Plus, they just look silly.

Yes, the obvious one here is Synchronised Swimming. No one doubts that it is hard to spend twenty minutes upside down, underwater and smiling like you have been poisoned by the Joker, but WHY?!?
Synchronised diving also gets called out here, I have my issues with diving as well, but who thought that two people diving together was a good idea? Not A Sport.

Walking – this is something everyone does, but if you want to get somewhere quicker, then you RUN! There is no call for an event that needs to be lined with thousands of officials staring with disturbing intensity at people’s legs, while the athletes pretend to ignore them and walk ‘normally’. If you like that sort of thing, go to a night club.

BMX / Mountain biking – This is a prime example of the issue I have with walking. If you want to know who is fastest on a bike, fine. But then creating silly courses and jumps and crashes just so you can be like that kid who wears his shorts around his thighs is not on. Adding additional cycling events just makes you feel like we were trying to find an event for our nephew who is really not good at much apart from roaming around shopping centre car parks on his bike.

Kayaking – There are two forms of this, the Sprint, and the Slalom. The Sprint gets removed as it is slower than rowing and therefore just silly. The Slalom is a massive man-made course that gets created for each Olympics and we then add water. That is not Kayaking, you get it a kayak to experience the random turns nature can throw at you, not to charge through a course that is designed to be unchanging, and entirely man-made. Plus there are silly gates you have to go backwards through, what is that about? The whole thing feels very synthetic and false. Gone.

...and what's this fascination to make 'doubles' events for everything...


Beach Volleyball, the Times has beaten me to this one, but they have their facts straight. Any sport where there is a maximum size of clothing for the girls is not taking itself seriously. (Yes I realise some of those requirements were relaxed to let Muslims play at the Olympics, but really, that just underlines my point).

Sailing – No, no, no. There is an inherent elitist element to it, although I do like the fact that men and women often complete in the same event. It is a bit like Formula One, lots of attention to getting the equipment set up right, getting the right equipment, and making decisions around weather conditions. Too much equipment and not enough athletic ability make this fail to meet my criteria of an Olympic Sport... We have the America’s Cup if you really want to get into that sort of thing.

What’s that you say? There are other sports that have much more prestigious competitions than the Olympics? Let’s take a look!

Monday, July 30, 2012

A few tweaks for the Games (Part 1)

(Part Two here)

The Olympics need to be changed. I have been telling people this for years, and recently I decided to codify my opinions in a single place, so that I would have a reference point for my occasional rants (yes really). This is that place.

Every four years we are drowned in a massive number of events over a ridiculous period of time, and every time people wonder why we keep adding sports, and basically making the entire thing complicated and unwatchable. Don’t even start me on the fact that some of these events involve animals, medieval weapons or convoluted methods of movement that while not the fastest are somehow considered worthy of inclusion (walking, butterfly, etc.).

So I have devised a series of rules to reduce the number of events, and I will then look at how that would impact the overall event.

Rule number 1: No animals.
Really, why did anyone ever think allowing circus tricks into a sporting event was a good idea? I’m sure it is hard to make Buttercup walk backwards, but I don’t see the point and I object to giving someone a medal for it.

The requirement for horses merely serves to ensure that the ultra-rich and royalty get to have an event they can participate in to the exclusion of everyone else. We just get to watch them on the sidelines and cheer. Enough.

So sorry Dressage, Eventing, Jumping, and especially Modern Pentathlon (because you just use random horses, and who cares which person is the best at simulating the experience of a 19th century cavalry soldier behind enemy lines?), but you are gone.

Having removed stupid pet tricks from my new Olympics we shall now focus on a more controversial topic in my next post….

Friday, July 27, 2012

Word’s greatest failing resolved!

I am stunned to discover that Microsoft Word 2010 actually has corrected an issue that has annoyed me since I first used the app. The issue of copying in content from other sources, and taking the source formatting with it. Yes, yes I knew about “Paste Special” / “Text Only” but was always frustrated that I could not make that a default option. Well now we have the options:

We can now decide how the paste function works depending on the source of the text! This is a happy moment. Please join with me in a small snoopy dance.